Showing 1 - 10 of 42
Public knowledge about India's ambitious Employment Guarantee Scheme is low in one of India's poorest states, Bihar, where participation is also unusually low. Is the solution simply to tell people their rights? Or does their lack of knowledge reflect deeper problems of poor people's agency and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395875
July 1999 - A workfare program was introduced in response to high unemployment in Argentina. An ex-post evaluation using matching methods indicates that the program generated sizable net income gains to generally poor participants. Jalan and Ravallion use propensity-score matching methods to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010524688
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010524980
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000992158
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001368431
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011925827
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129702
Prevailing practices in evaluating workfare programs have ignored the disutility of the type of work done, with theoretically ambiguous implications for the impacts on poverty. In the case of India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, past assessments have relied solely on household...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395557
Workfare schemes impose work requirements on beneficiaries. This has seemed an attractive idea for self-targeting transfers to poor people. This incentive argument does not imply, however, that workfare is more cost-effective against poverty than even poorly-targeted options, given hidden costs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010510673