Showing 1 - 10 of 10
This article deals with the impact of governmental assistance on insurance demand under ambiguity, i.e., in situations where probabilities are uncertain. First, using a model of insurance demand under ambiguity, we derive theoretical predictions about the impact of several governmental...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010865828
This article presents the results of an experiment designed to test theoretical predictions about the impact of public compensation schemes and ambiguity on insurance and self-insurance decisions. Consistent with theory, we find that government assistance significantly reduces willingness to pay...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005466665
In this paper, we build on the emerging literature on group decision-making to study the so-called ‘group shift’ effect, i.e., groups are less risk-averse than individuals. Our study complements past research in two ways. First, we study the group shift effect under two sources of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009019464
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011459241
In this article, we estimate the demand of French private forest owners for forest insurance against fire risk. For this purpose, we combine experimental data and real-world data on forest owners’ characteristics. Our econometric approach consists in estimating both insurance participation and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011094571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014550835
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863415
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863439
Testing whether risk professionals (here insurers) behave differently under risk and ambiguity when they cover catastrophic risks (floods and earthquakes) and non-catastrophic risks (fires), this paper reports the results of the first field experiment in the United States designed to distinguish...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008602582
Sources of uncertainty appear to affect attitude towards ambiguity. For instance, when two advisors agree on a range of probabilities and, when they disagree - one advisor predicting the upper bound of the range while the other predicts the lower bound of the range †decision-makers might have...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005014574