Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009772412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010357096
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009719753
We show empirically that analysts who display more consistent forecast errors have greater ability to affect prices, and that this effect is larger than that of stated accuracy. These results lead to three implications. First, consistent analysts are less likely to be demoted and are more likely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014173783
We show empirically that analysts who display more consistent forecast errors have greater ability to affect prices, and that this effect is larger than that of stated accuracy. These results lead to three implications. First, consistent analysts are less likely to be demoted and are more likely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112082
We test the implications of anchoring bias associated with forecast earnings per share (FEPS) for forecast errors, earnings surprises, stock returns, and stock splits. We find that analysts make optimistic (pessimistic) forecasts when a firm's FEPS is lower (higher) than the industry median....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013092369
We show that analysts who display more consistent forecast errors have a greater effect on stock prices than analysts who provide more accurate but less consistent forecasts. This result leads to three implications. First, consistent analysts are less likely to be demoted to a less prestigious...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013077088
We show that analysts who display more consistent forecast errors have a greater effect on stock prices than analysts who provide more accurate but less consistent forecasts. This result leads to three implications. First, consistent analysts are less likely to be demoted to a less prestigious...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013053646