Showing 1 - 10 of 3,612
have the potential to distract antitrust analysis from its core mission: protecting competition and consumer welfare. While …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014195598
This comment was filed with the Department of Justice Antitrust Division on December 31, 2009, as "Comments Regarding Agriculture and Antitrust Enforcement Issues in Our 21st Century Economy" in response to the DOJ/USDA request for public comments for the agencies' joint workshops on antitrust...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014197943
The IEEE-SA updated patent policy and the Business Review Letter issued by the US DoJ have caused much discussion in the US (Sidak, 2015). The purpose of this paper is to assess whether a similarly lenient antitrust approach to Standard Setting Organizations’ (“SSOs”) rate setting policies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014128859
The Austrian Federal Competition Authority (AFCA) invited comment on its draft guidelines for exempting “sustainability agreements” from condemnation under Austrian competition law. That law recently changed, allowing a specific exemption for otherwise anticompetitive horizontal agreements...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014081835
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013131757
There is a raging debate within antitrust to determine how to best assess the conduct of digital platforms and tailor the enforcement of antitrust laws to the modern economy. The distinguishing features of digital platforms can make their analysis quite different from conventional, single-sided...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013288880
consumer welfare. We show that this argument is based on a misunderstanding of the kind of price discrimination that is … involved in variable proportion ties. The great majority of them almost certainly produce both welfare gains and net consumer … benefits. We also consider and reject the argument that tying produces greater welfare losses when viewed from an ex ante …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014205784
Has the antitrust arsenal run out of novel theories or weapons? Think again. Recent scholarship has come to challenge conventional wisdom with the latest target of antitrust imagination being institutional investors, including diversified index funds. New economic research suggests that common...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952957
Something old and important is lost sight of in a case like Ohio v. American Express, the Supreme Court's recent adoption of "platform" or "two-sided market" theory in American antitrust, and in theoretical efforts like the one on which it is based. A rarely discussed idea built in to American...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892397
-sided markets. In addition, we argue that his "consumer welfare" criterion is misleading and liable to deceive, thus the hoax. The … Bork's definition of "consumer welfare" - it includes the economic rents of the firm - all at a cost to consumers … no producer's surplus - the estimated loss of consumers' welfare in $60.4 and $43.7 billion respectively from Google and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012804859