Showing 1 - 10 of 908
reveal important insights on individuals acting as firms, they largely ignore individual heterogeneity, such as gender … differences. We experimentally analyze gender differences in prisoner's dilemmas, where collusive behavior harms a passive third … less inclined to collude than men when collusion harms a third party. No gender difference can be found in the absence of a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938866
reveal important insights on individuals acting as firms, they largely ignore individual heterogeneity, such as gender … differences. We experimentally analyze gender differences in prisoner's dilemmas, where collusive behavior harms a passive third … less inclined to collude than men when collusion harms a third party. No gender difference can be found in the absence of a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012886259
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010528915
Empirical evidence that horizontal shareholding has created anticompetitive effects in airline and banking markets have produced calls for antitrust enforcement. In response, others have critiqued the airline and banking studies and argued that antitrust law cannot tackle any anticompetitive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011972909
The chapter critically surveys the behavioral analysis of commercial law. It begins by examining the preliminary question of whether bounded rationality can persist in well-functioning, highly competitive markets. As the theoretical analysis and empirical evidence demonstrate, irrational...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012931640
Competition law curricula pay scant, if any, attention to gender. This paper argues in favour of integrating gender … a framework for appraising the gender neutrality of competition law. The selected threads from feminist enquiry unmask … to offer illustrations of assumed gender neutrality, this paper looks at economic research on, firstly, competition …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012828415
In recent years, progressive public intellectuals and prominent scholars have asserted that monopoly power lies at the root of wealth inequality and that increases in antitrust enforcement are necessary to stem its rising tide. This claim is misguided. Exercises of market power have complex,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013017197
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003888975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003742697
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003749050