Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001780952
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002851571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001720556
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003401481
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003761353
Victims of antitrust violations can recover damages in court. Yet, the quantification of antitrust damages and to whom they accrue is often complex. An illegal price increase somewhere in the chain of production percolates through to the other layers in a ripple of partial pass-ons. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014208684
In its landmark ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois in 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court restricted standing to sue for recovery of antitrust damages to direct purchasers. However, antitrust damages are typically (in part) passed on to intermediaries lower in the chain of production and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011343268
In its landmark ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, the U.S. Supreme Court restricted standing to sue for recovery of damages suffered from a breach of federal antitrust law to direct purchasers only. Even though typically antitrust injury is, at least in part, passed on to firms lower in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014064647
Competition policy is a subject of heated debate. Antitrust authorities, seeking to battle anticompetitive behavior in complex cases to the best of their abilities, often find themselves advised by rival economic theories and disputed empirical analyses. As a consequence, there is a real...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014094885