Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Atypical work arrangements have long been criticized as offering more precarious and lower paid work than regular open-ended employment. In an important paper, Booth et al. (2002) were among the first to recognize that notwithstanding their potential deficiencies, such jobs also functioned as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010272342
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003864521
Atypical work arrangements have long been criticized as offering more precarious and lower paid work than regular open‐ended employment. An important British paper by Booth et al. (Economic Journal, Vol. 112 (2002), No. 480, pp. F189–F213) was among the first to recognize such jobs also...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014139455
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011346143
Atypical work arrangements have long been criticized as offering more precarious and lower paid work than regular open-ended employment. In an important paper, Booth et al. (2002) were among the first to recognize that notwithstanding their potential deficiencies, such jobs also functioned as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003900589
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009660886