Showing 1 - 10 of 10,490
Settlements are often considered to be welfare-enhancing because they save time and litigation costs. In the presence of court error, however, this conclusion may be wrong. Court decisions create positive externalities for future litigants which will not occur if a dispute is settled out of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008760481
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012224609
We develop a model of individual prosecutors (and teams of prosecutors) to address the incentives for the suppression of exculpatory evidence. Our model assumes that each individual prosecutor trades off a desire for career advancement (by winning a case) and a disutility for knowingly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012919770
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011975178
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003952387
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001247231
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012168519
negotiations and revisits the selection hypothesis in the case where these legal expenditures are private information. This … negotiations select cases with the smallest legal expenditures as those going to trial, while cases with largest costs prefer to …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217602
This article studies the strategic use of collective negotiation in multiplaintiff litigation. Compared with one-on-one negotiation, collective negotiation can change the distribution of per-plaintiff damages in a manner that influences the defendant's bargaining incentive. Informational...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014116087
defendant's type during negotiations, and a trial assigns payoff depending on the evidence if they fail to reach an agreement …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013307746