Showing 1 - 8 of 8
The traditional approach to flexible retirement (e.g. NDC) neglects the impact of asymmetric information on actuarial fairness (neutrality). The mechanism design approach (e.g. Diamond, 2003) gives up the requirement of neutrality and looks for a redistributive second-best benefit-retirement-age...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002523171
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002510284
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002034908
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003155151
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009304010
The traditional approach to flexible retirement (e.g. NDC) neglects the impact of asymmetric information on actuarial fairness (neutrality). The mechanism design approach (e.g. Diamond, 2003) gives up the requirement of neutrality and looks for a redistributive second-best benefit-retirement-age...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261115
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001688318
The traditional approach to flexible retirement (e.g. NDC) neglects the impact of asymmetric information on actuarial fairness (neutrality). The mechanism design approach (e.g. Diamond, 2003) gives up the requirement of neutrality and looks for a redistributive second-best benefit-retirement-age...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318797