Showing 1 - 10 of 18
This paper considers a government auctioning off multiple licenses to firms who compete in a market after the auction. Firms have different costs, and cost efficiency is private information at the auction stage and the market competition stage. If only one license is auctioned, standard results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011350364
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002695286
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003836380
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009724097
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009724816
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003408800
This paper develops one possible argument why auctioning licenses to op-erate in an aftermarket may lead to higher prices in the aftermarket comparedto a more random allocation mechanism. Key ingredients in the argumentare differences in firms' risk attitudes and the fact that future market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011343288
Aftermarket social welfare is largely determined by a procurement auction design. Auctions select firms for operating aftermarkets, and auctions may also impose restrictions on aftermarket prices the winner can charge. This paper compares aftermarket social welfare generated by first-price and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014446446
This paper develops an economic argument relating auctions to high marketprices. At the core of the argument is the claim that market competition andbidding in an auction should be analyzed as part of one game, where the pricingstrategies in the market subgame depend on the bidding strategies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011333269
This paper develops one possible argument why auctioning licenses to op-erate in an aftermarket may lead to higher prices in the aftermarket comparedto a more random allocation mechanism. Key ingredients in the argumentare differences in firms' risk attitudes and the fact that future market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325283