Showing 1 - 10 of 96
The paper aims to establish that Terence Hutchison's argument in The Politics and Philosophy of Economics (1981) to the effect that the young F.A. Hayek maintained a methodological position markedly similar to that of Ludwig von Mises fails to establish the relevant conclusion. The first problem...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938435
It is generally accepted that F.A. Hayek gave up the business cycle as an object of theoretical investigation following the publication of 1941's The Pure Theory of Capital. The present paper aims to cast a shade of doubt upon this received view. Many of Hayek's philosophical writings bear...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011706943
This paper focuses on Ludwig von Mises methodological apriorism. It uses Wittgenstein’s private language argument as the basis for a critique of Mises’s claim to have found apodictically certain foundations for economic analysis. It is argued instead that Mises’s methodology is more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014139391
The ethical and legal thought of Thomas Aquinas and F. A. Hayek emerged out of distinct philosophical traditions. Aquinas, following the Aristotelian tradition, emphasized the inexact character of ethics and hence the mutability of law due to the contingency of particular circumstances. Hayek,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014056888
Both Keynes’ and Hayek’s shared the belief that there existed a need to revisit the economic discourse that began in the thirties and involved their respective analyses of growth and the business cycle. This paper looks at these topics and discovers some of the deep methodological, cultural,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014243406
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003461229
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003976272
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003856936
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476508