Showing 1 - 10 of 50
We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show “Deal or No Deal” and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011348343
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003268565
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013286590
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011942607
We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show “Deal or No Deal” and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325560
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008663204
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003237672
This study investigates reference-dependent choice with a stochastic, state-dependent reference point. The optimal reference-dependent solution equals the optimal consumption solution (no loss aversion) if the reference point is selected fully endogenously. Given that loss aversion is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003550680
Traditionell haben Finanz-Ökonomen Anlageentscheidungen im sogenannten "Mean-Variance-FrameworkX" von Markowitz (1952) evaluiert. Experimente haben jedoch gezeigt, dass die "Prospect Theory" von Kahneman und Tversky (1979) eine bessere Beschreibung der Entscheidungen von Anlegern unter...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011449289
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003133543