Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003913531
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011334805
Two broad classes of consumption dynamics - long-run risks and rare disasters - have proven successful in explaining the equity premium puzzle when used in conjunction with recursive preference. We show that bounds a-la Gallant, Hansen and Tauchen (1990) that restrict the volatility of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938615
We show that a business-cycle component of consumption growth (dubbed business-cycle consumption) with cycles between 2 and 4 years is effective in explaining the differences in risk premia across alternative test assets, including recently-proposed anomaly portfolios. We formalize the mapping...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012856904
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012546171
We classify asset pricing anomalies into those that exacerbate mispricing (build-up anomalies) and those that resolve it (resolution anomalies). To this end, we estimate the dynamics of price wedges for a large number of well-known anomaly portfolios in the factor zoo and map them to firm-level...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013241479
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014583393
We provide a measure of sparsity for expected returns within the context of classical factor models. Our measure is inversely related to the percentage of active predictors. Empirically, sparsity varies over time and displays an apparent countercyclical behavior. Proxies for financial conditions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848158
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013549854
According to no-arbitrage, risk-adjusted returns should be unpredictable. Using several prominent factor models and a large cross-section of anomalies, we find that past pricing errors predict future risk-adjusted anomaly returns. We show that past pricing errors can be interpreted as deviations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014348676