Showing 1 - 10 of 414
Bank capital regulation seems to be today's most accepted regulatory instrument. The reasoning is that limited liability and deposit insurance appear to give banks incentives for excessive risk-taking. Capital requirements can alleviate this problem as banks are obliged to hold more capital...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011474803
We study optimal capital requirement regulation in a dynamic quantitative model in which nonfinancial firms, as well as households, hold deposits. Firms hold deposits for precautionary reasons and to facilitate the acquisition of production inputs. Our theoretical analysis identifies a novel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012132611
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012019329
This paper tests whether an increase in insured deposits causes banks to become more risky. We use variation introduced by the U.S. Emergency Economic Stabilization Act in October 2008, which increased the deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor and bank. For some...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012061062
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012104982
This study explores the influence of supervisory powers and structure of a banking supervisor on the bank's risk-taking caused by the implementation of explicit deposit insurance (EDI). We explorethe data of publically traded 1,936 banks of 96 countries, from the Bank scope during 2002 to 2015....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012107792
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011554675
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011586992
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011339508
Recent econometric evidence has noticeably changed views on the desirability and the appropriate design of explicit Deposit Insurance Schemes (DIS). The purpose of this paper is to take a second look at the data. After surveying recent empirical work and providing a theoretical framework, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010440433