Showing 1 - 10 of 748
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011815983
The regulator that designs and first implements a federal regulatory program does not always have the ability to control the timing and process of how that regulatory program will, in this Symposium’s language, “exit.” As the 2016 election has demonstrated, the initiating regulator cannot...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014116240
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003737866
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000786712
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003973763
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003502333
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003368687
The component parts of a more complete market system in digital assets are steadily being assembled. The initial focus on the primary market has increasingly expanded to the secondary market. An increasingly important subject of regulatory concern is the activities of cryptoexchanges. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012843671
of the deregulation era in federal domestic policy. This article reviews the history of the rise of federal regulation in … the United States, the intellectual and political reasons for deregulation, and the subsequent expansion of federal … deregulation …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012955591
Banking is risky and prone to failure. Yet banking regulation is surprisingly not all that risk-sensitive in practice. I show that when the bank has an informational advantage over the regulator, designing risk-sensitive banking regulation gives rise to a trade-off: relying on the banking market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012935624