Showing 1 - 10 of 12
In attempting to promote bank stability, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006) provides a framework that seeks to control the amount of tail risk that large banks take in their trading books. However, banks around the world suffered sizeable trading losses during the recent crisis....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009528885
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011316632
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009708765
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010372635
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003381921
In attempting to promote international financial stability, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006) provided a framework that sought to control the amount of tail risk that large banks around the world would take in their trading books relative to their corresponding minimum capital...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952230
Recognizing that many banks suffered trading losses that notably exceeded their minimum capital requirements during the recent crisis, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2011) revised its regulatory framework for trading portfolios. In this paper, we compare: (1) the relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952231
In attempting to promote bank stability, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006) provides a framework that seeks to control the amount of tail risk that large banks take in their trading books. However, banks around the world suffered sizeable trading losses during the recent crisis....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012988825
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013284960
In the aftermath of bank proprietary trading losses in the 2007–09 crisis, the Basel framework uses stressed Conditional Value-at-Risk to set minimum capital requirements for proprietary trading portfolios, whereas the Volcker rule restricts their composition in the US. With or without this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013322667