Showing 1 - 7 of 7
In December 2010 the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a set of new regulations for banks in response to the financial crisis. This paper aims at evaluating the possible effects of the new framework on banks' available regulatory capital and risk-weighted assets and assessing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013082457
Fifteen years after the introduction of the Basel II Accord, which thoroughly revised the capital framework for banks, internal models are a full part of the supervisory toolkit and the risk management framework of financial institutions. The debate around models has gone through different...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012297474
In many standard derivation and presentations of risk measures like the Value-at-Risk or the Expected Shortfall, it is assumed that all the model's parameters are known. In practice, however, the parameters must be estimated and this introduces an additional source of uncertainty that is usually...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012421124
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009426043
The far-reaching regulatory activity in which the financial sector has been involved in recent years has been attracting increased attention to the expected costs and benefits of such regulation; measures undertaken in response to the financial crisis have made these issues even more topical....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013125897
This paper examines the evolution of the Pillar 2 framework for banks, introduced by the Basel 2 Accord, and discusses the main issues at stake in the current policy debate. The main objective of Pillar 2 was to complement the minimum requirements established by regulators (Pillar 1) with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012865137
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012037981