Showing 1 - 10 of 12
We study the role of commitment in a version of the Diamond and Dybvig (JPE, 1983) model with no aggregate uncertainty. As is well known, the banking authority can eliminate the possibility of a bank run by committing to suspend payments to depositors if a run were to start. We show, however,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010283412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003896786
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003484365
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003437253
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008666420
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003298760
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002049362
We study ex post efficient policy responses to a run on the banking system and the ex ante incentives these responses create. We show that the efficient response to a run is typically not to freeze all remaining deposits, since doing so imposes heavy costs on some individuals. Instead, once a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013114962
Governments typically respond to a run on the banking system by temporarily freezing deposits and by rescheduling payments to depositors. Depositors may even be required to demonstrate an urgent need for funds before being allowed to withdraw. We study ex post efficient policy responses to a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013096791
We examine how the possibility of a bank run affects the investment decisions made by a competitive bank. Cooper and Ross (1998, Bank runs: liquidity costs and investment distortions. Journal of Monetary Economics 41, 27–38) have shown that when the probability of a run is small, the bank will...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013086704