Showing 1 - 4 of 4
We consider an extension of the standard Rubinstein model where both players are randomly allowed to leave the negotiation after a rejection, in which case they obtain a payoff known value. We show that, when the value of the outside opportunities is of intermediate size, there exist a continuum...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369115
This paper explores the role of conflict as a bargaining tool. It first presents a simple bargaining model with one-sided incomplete information. Parties can choose the scope of the confrontation they may want to engage in: A limited conflict that only introduces delay, or an absolute conflict...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005086773
This paper studies bargaining and conflict under incomplete information, provides an overview and a critical account of the literature on the topic and contributes with original research. We first revise models of mechanism design and sequential bargaining that take confrontation as final....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008465156
We propose a new bargaining solution, based on the idea - borrowed from Hobbes - that the agreement reached in a negotiation should be determined by how the direct conflict resulting from disagreement would be resolved. The explicit modeling of the disagreement game directly leads to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005750726