Showing 1 - 10 of 37
How do people trade off efficiency against equality concerns? To study this question, we conducted a modified mini ultimatum game (N=120) in which proposers were asked to choose between offering 8:2 and y:y, y∈{5, 4.5, 4,.., 0.5}; all offers in Euro. According to the data, 58 of 60 proposers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013084331
In this experimental study, involving subjects from Abu-Dis (West Bank), Chengdu (China), Helsinki (Finland), and Jerusalem (Israel), we test for a presentation bias in a two-person cooperation game. In the positive frame of the game, a transfer creates a positive externality for the opposite...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003978627
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905021
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003546360
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011482088
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008749032
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009273591
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003663000
We experimentally investigate multiple notions of equity in ultimatum bargaining with asymmetric outside options. Building on the generalized equity principle formulated by Selten (1978), we derive three different equity rules that can explain 43% of all offers. Our within-subject design further...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013074889
We systematically investigate prisoner's dilemma games and dictator games with valence framing. We find that give versus take frames influence subjects' behavior and beliefs in the prisoner's dilemma game but not in the dictator game
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012963586