Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009712792
Real-world negotiations differ fundamentally from existing bargaining theory. Inspired by the Paris Agreement on climate change, this paper develops a novel bargaining game in which each party quanti.es its own contribution (to a public good, for example), before the set of pledges must be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011924561
Inspired by the negotiations leading up to the Paris Agreement on climate change, I study a bargaining game where every party is proposing only its own contribution, before the set of pledges must be unanimously approved. I show that, with uncertain tolerance for delay, each equilibrium pledge...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013488863
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014319411
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013555093
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003505558
Why do rational politicians choose inefficient policy instruments? Environmental regulation, for example, often takes the form of technology standards and quotas even when cost-effective Pigou taxes are available. To shed light on this puzzle, we present a stochastic game with multiple...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012158858
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013394625
Real-world negotiations differ fundamentally from existing bargaining theory. Inspired by the Paris Agreement on climate change, this paper develops a novel bargaining game in which each party quantities its own contribution (to a public good, for example), before the set of pledges must be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892276
The paper presents a dynamic game where players contribute to a public bad, invest in technologies, and write incomplete contracts. Despite the n 1 stocks in the model, the analysis is tractable and the symmetric Markov perfect equilibrium unique. If only the contribution levels are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014193646