Showing 1 - 10 of 1,397
We investigate how provisioning models affect bank regulation. We study an accuracy vs. timeliness trade-off between an incurred loss model (IL) and a current expected credit loss model (CECL). Relative to IL, CECL improves efficiency by enabling timely intervention to curb inefficient ex post...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012843474
Amendment of IAS 39 by the IASB in 2008 provided an option to reclassify investments from fair value to historical cost. Whereas this option was available to all firms, it was particularly relevant to banks. We predict that “too important to fail” (TITF) banks took less advantage of this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901923
Economic policymakers express concern that procyclical lending by banks imperils financial stability. Prior research finds that banks that record timelier loan loss provisions originate more loans during downturns, consistent with loan-loss-provision timeliness mitigating loan-origination...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012940327
Large net loan charge-offs are frequently associated with large decreases in nonperforming loans and large increases in loan loss provisions, inducing a V-shaped relation between loan loss provisions and nonperforming loan changes. Failure to model the asymmetry attributable to net loan...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012824641
Large net loan charge-offs are frequently associated with large decreases in nonperforming loans and large increases in loan loss provisions, inducing a V-shaped relation between loan loss provisions and nonperforming loan changes. Failure to model the asymmetry attributable to net loan...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849920
Analyzing public and private US commercial banks, we document a discontinuity around the 10% regulatory capital ratio. This threshold separates well capitalized from adequately capitalized banks, granting benefits to banks that fall into the former category. We find that the significance and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012851559
We examine the period over which banking authorities discussed, adopted, and implemented Basel III to understand whether, when, and how firms respond to proposed regulation. We find evidence to suggest that the affected banks not only lobbied rule makers against it, but these banks also made...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012856871
This paper examines banks’ option to adopt the capital transitional arrangement (CTA) set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, in response to the introduction of the International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9), which requires the use of an expected credit loss model...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013224582
The Basel III Accord tightens capital adequacy requirements for banks by increasing the minimum Tier 1 regulatory capital threshold from 4 to 6 percent. It also emphasizes the need to improve timeliness of loan loss provisions. Using a sample of European banks, we examine the impact of this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013241112
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, bank regulators are paying more attention to derivatives. In a move that can be seen as a step away from fair-value accounting, bank regulators (Basel III) have proposed to calculate bank leverage ratios using notional values, rather than fair values, of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013034704