Showing 1 - 10 of 32
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003888989
We study and test a class of boundedly rational models of decision making which rely on sequential eliminative heuristics. We formalize two sequential decision procedures, both inspired by plausible models popular among several psychologists and marketing scientists. However we follow a standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003474120
If choices depend on the decision maker's mood, is the attempt to derive any consistency in choice doomed? In this paper we argue that, even with full unpredictability of mood, the way choices from a menu relate to choices from another menu exhibits some structure. We present two alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003976547
We study a psychologically based foundation for choice errors. The decision maker applies a preference ranking after forming a 'consideration set' prior to choosing an alternative. Membership of the consideration set is determined both by the alternative specific salience and by the rationality...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003976811
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003996076
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003996083
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003671762
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009548962
We propose a novel method to model an agent who is imperfectly attentive in the sense that she may consider only some of the alternatives available. Our methodology departs from the standard 'revealed preference' one: we make plausible assumptions on the values to the imperfectly attentive agent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010517698
There are many situations in which alternatives ranked by quality wish to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by selecting their own salience. The chooser may be "tricked" into choosing more salient but inferior alternatives. We investigate when competitive forces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010517700