Showing 21 - 30 of 3,900
We use a combination of lab and field evidence to study whether preferences for immediacy and the tendency to procrastinate are connected as in O'Donoghue and Rabin (1999a). To measure immediacy, we have participants choose between smaller-sooner and larger-later rewards. Both rewards are paid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013121215
Successful development programs rely on people to behave and choose in certain ways, and behavioral economics helps us … understand why people behave and choose as they do. Approaching problems in development using behavioral economics thus leads to … better diagnosis and to better-designed solutions. This paper sketches how to use behavioral insights to design development …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010393281
Empirical evidence suggests that choices are affected by the amount of time available to the decision maker. Time pressure or a cooling-off period (mandatory delay of choice) changes how choices are determined. Yet, few models are able to account for the role of available time on decisions. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011703384
experiences? We report on a field experiment designed to address this question. Incumbent clients of a lender in South Africa were …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369232
experiences? We report on a field experiment designed to address this question. Incumbent clients of a lender in South Africa were …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005558488
We run an experiment in Ethiopia where farmers can use their own money to decrease the money of others (money burning …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014131778
We hypothesise and confirm a previously unnoticed pattern within pre-existing data on the endowment effect, collected via seven experiments employing the original design. Subjects with low valuations in binary choice relative to other subjects set a proportionally higher willingness to accept....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008990543
This short paper shows that the Allais Paradox and the Common Ratio Effect - regarded as classic examples of the violation of the Expected Utility Theory Axioms - may be easily explained by assuming that changes in wealth (i.e. gains and losses) are perceived in relative terms. The preference...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153294
laboratory experiment to show that EUT of income cannot explain risk aversion either. The experimental data suggests that the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012935355
We measure individual-level loss aversion using three incentivized, representative surveys of the U.S. population (combined N=3,000). We find that around 50% of the U.S. population is loss tolerant, with many participants accepting negative-expected-value gambles. This is counter to earlier...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013334460