Showing 61 - 70 of 6,211
modest magnitude and fails to translate into an effect on preference reversal rates in either experiment. We also use …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012520210
Both economists and psychologists are interested in understanding decision making under uncertainty. Yet, they rely on different concepts to analyse human behaviour: Economists use economic preference parameters rooted in utility theory, while psychologists use personality traits to describe...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012851581
implications: what is 'played out' at the end of the experiment is not influenced by subjects choosing this middle column. In other … experiment, which adopts this latter incentive mechanism, and ask the question as to why people might choose this option, that is …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012869670
We empirically evaluate the performance of three heteroskedastic error models, namely the Contextual Utility, the Stronger Utility, and the Entropy models, relative to the classical Fechner specifications. The three heteroskedastic specifications are different in how complete they incorporate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013298472
This short paper shows that the Allais Paradox and the Common Ratio Effect - regarded as classic examples of the violation of the Expected Utility Theory Axioms - may be easily explained by assuming that changes in wealth (i.e. gains and losses) are perceived in relative terms. The preference...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153294
This paper proposes a model of attention allocation in decision-making. Attention has various definitions across the literature. Here, I understand attention as selecting information for costly processing. The paper investigates how an agent rationally allocates attention. The resulting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011514816
We measure individual-level loss aversion using three incentivized, representative surveys of the U.S. population (combined N = 3,000). We find that around 50% of the U.S. population is loss tolerant, with many participants accepting negative-expected-value gambles. This is counter to earlier...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014081263
laboratory experiment to show that EUT of income cannot explain risk aversion either. The experimental data suggests that the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012935355
We measure individual-level loss aversion using three incentivized, representative surveys of the U.S. population (combined N=3,000). We find that around 50% of the U.S. population is loss tolerant, with many participants accepting negative-expected-value gambles. This is counter to earlier...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013334460
We explore the individual and joint explanatory power of concepts from economics, psychology, and criminology for criminal behavior. More precisely, we consider risk and time preferences, personality traits from psychology (Big Five and locus of control), and a self-control scale from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010235856