Showing 1 - 10 of 611
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011800332
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013162934
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003926267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009684113
This paper uses an extensive dataset compiled by the author to quantitatively study the determinants of academic and industry innovations measured by the numbers of journal publications, patents and Nobel Laureates. I use sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of estimates to specification...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012770632
Braun et al. (2006) recommended using the h-index as an alternative to the journal impact factor (IF) to qualify journals. In this paper, a Bayesian-based sensitivity analysis is performed with the aid of mathematical models to examine the behavior of the journal h-index to changes in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012949052
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012521597
quality of published research that enters decisions on jobs, salary, tenure, etc. Academic ranking scales in economics and … ranking systems are competing, allow for different disciplinary gravity and sometimes give orthogonal results. Here a … Scholar (GS) systems is presented. Quantile regression allows us to successfully predict missing ranking data and to obtain a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011459002
It is well-known that the distribution of citations to articles in a journal is skewed. We ask whether journal rankings based on the impact factor are robust with respect to this fact. We exclude the most cited paper, the top 5 and 10 cited papers for 100 economics journals and recalculate the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010422064
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013161551