Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011743963
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010506059
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010362860
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010362861
We compare two bootstrap methods for assessing mutual fund performance. Kosowski, Timmermann, Wermers and White (2006) produces narrow confidence intervals due to pooling over time, while Fama and French (2010) produces wider confidence intervals because it preserves the cross-correlation of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013013404
Two new methodologies are introduced to improve inference in the evaluation of mutual fund performance against benchmarks. First, the benchmark models are estimated using panel methods with both fund and time effects. Second, the non-normality of individual mutual fund returns is accounted for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012996413
We compare two bootstrap methods for assessing mutual fund performance. Kosowski, Timmermann, Wermers and White (2006) produces narrow confidence intervals due to pooling over time, while Fama and French (2010) produces wider confidence intervals because it preserves the cross-correlation of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012996414