Showing 1 - 10 of 61
Ability drain's (AD) impact seems economically significant, with 30% of US Nobel laureates since 1906 being immigrants, and immigrants or their children founding 40% of Fortune 500 companies. Nonetheless, while brain drain (BD) and gain (BG) have been studied extensively, AD has not. I examine...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012112999
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003673406
Is ability drain (AD) economically significant? That immigrants or their children founded over 40% of the Fortune 500 US companies suggests it is. Moreover, brain drain (BD) induces a brain gain (BG). This cannot occur with ability. Nonetheless, while BD has been studied extensively, AD drain...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011407693
Based on static partial equilibrium analysis, the "new brain drain" literature argues that, by raising the return to education, a brain drain generates a brain gain that is, under certain conditions, larger than the brain drain itself, and that such a net brain gain results in an increase in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002815345
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003133944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012668256
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011946168
Though a net brain gain has tended to be seen as a benefit and referred to as a 'beneficial brain drain' in the literature, its welfare impact for source country residents - or non-migrants - is at best ambiguous. Increased educational investment in response to a brain drain is equivalent to a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011849103
Based on a welfare-maximization model of skilled migration where education generates a positive externality, this paper examines whether the early view regarding brain drain's (BD) negative impact on source countries - and the Bhagwati tax (𝐵𝑇) associated with it - is compatible with the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129754