Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003540316
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003540356
In Magni [Eur. J. Operat. Res. 137 (2002) 206] I present some inconsistencies implicit in the net-present-value criterion, as currently used in finance. This paper shows that the standard use of CAPM for capital budgeting, based on disequilibrium values, is at odds with arbitrage theory, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013071130
This work deals with the classical capital-budgeting criterion derived from the CAPM, according to which a project is profitable if and only if its expected return rate is greater than the cost of capital. This criterion, presented by several authors (e.g. Rubinstein, 1973) is regarded as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013159333
This paper deals with the CAPM-derived capital budgeting criterion, and in particular with Rubinstein’s (1973) criterion, according to which a project is profitable if the project rate of return is greater than the risk-adjusted cost of capital, where the latter depends on the project’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011267900
This paper shows that (i) project valuation via disequilibrium NPV+CAPM contradicts valuation via arbitrage pricing, (ii) standard CAPM-minded decision makers may fail to profit from arbitrage opportunities, (iii) standard CAPM-based valuation violates value additivity. As a consequence, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005260104
This paper uses counterexamples and simple formalization to show that the standard CAPM-based Net Present Value may not be used for investment valuations. The reason is that the standard CAPM-based capital budgeting criterion implies a notion of value which does not comply with the principle of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005260262
This paper expands on the results obtained in Magni (2009) regarding investment decisions with the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). It is shown that four different decision criteria are deductively drawn from this model: the disequilibrium Net Present Value (NPV), the equilibrium NPV, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013143373
This paper shows that a decision maker using the CAPM for valuing firms and making decisions may contradict Modigliani and Miller’s Proposition I, if he adopts the widely-accepted disequilibrium NPV. As a consequence, CAPM-minded agents employing this NPV are open to arbitrage losses and miss...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004980381
This paper deals with the use of the CAPM for capital budgeting purposes. Four different measures are deductively drawn from this model: the disequilibrium Net Present Value, the equilibrium Net Present Value, the disequilibrium Net Future Value, the equilibrium Net Future Value. While all of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005055505