Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008779213
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009152299
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009751239
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009712441
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010418172
This paper provides a comprehensive examination of whether portfolios formed on capital asset pricing model anomalies capture information related to changes in the investment opportunity set and therefore may appropriate candidates as state variables within Merton's (1973) ICAPM framework....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013121464
The level of firm investment, along with firm profitability, has been shown to be empirically powerful asset pricing factors in the US and other markets. The q-factor model of Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2014), and the 5-factor model of Fama and French (2014a), both rely on factors capturing the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012904443
This paper provides a comprehensive examination of whether portfolios formed on capital asset pricing model anomalies capture information related to changes in the investment opportunity set and therefore may be appropriate candidates as state variables within Merton's (1973) ICAPM framework....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012905817
Recent theory relates expected returns and covariant risk to the investment decisions of a firm. The irreversible nature of physical assets-in-place results in them being riskier than growth options across certain stages of the business cycle. Using the Australian accounting environment, this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012906037
Zhang (2005) and Cooper (2006) provide a theoretical risk-based explanation for the value premium by suggesting a nexus between firms' book-to-market ratio and investment irreversibility. They argue that unproductive physical capacity is costly in contracting conditions, but provides growth...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012906204