Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688947
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873905
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873909
This article uses different standpoints to approach the question of the consistency of project valuation methods. It shows that the NPV of a project can be obtained by discounting adjusted operating cash flows at a different rate from the risk-adjusted discount rate which should normally be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153034
Richard Miller's reply (2008) to my comment (2008) on his claim (2007) that the standard WACC formula fails to correctly remunerate shareholders and bondholders raises crucial questions on the nature of the project's debt that he considers in his calculations. To clarify this point, I here...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153362
In this journal, Miller (2008) argues that the standard WACC formula fails to correctly remunerate shareholders and bondholders. This is proved by considering a project yielding a zero net present value. In this comment, we prove that this apparent failure of the standard WACC approach simply...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153367
This paper shows how to value investment projects involving capitalization of interest costs by using the standard WACC method. Whenever capitalized interest costs do not immediately generate proportionate tax shields, one of the assumptions that justify the use of the after-tax weighted average...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013146220