Showing 1 - 10 of 7,598
The IRS's position should not be considered to conflict with the arm's length principle. The OECD countries can always hold this view against the U.S., by stating that highly valuable marketing intangibles were created in the hands of OECD distributors. Now that it has been determined that U.S....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115957
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003561052
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010346401
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003833439
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003877286
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010426226
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003360042
This article reviews the recent landmark transfer-pricing case law in Canada. It suggests that the Canadian courts may have given birth to a sixth comparability factor for the application of the arm's-length principle that contravenes the intent of section 247 of the Income Tax Act. This new...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013013283
The paperwork aims at comparing interpretation of the definition of intangibles and ownership determination in order to apply transfer pricing laws and rules in the US, Russia, and particularly the OECD transfer pricing approach.Transfer pricing of intangibles is a hot issue among OECD members....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013034003
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011567420