Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009775041
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003742721
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003821757
Consider a durable goods producer that potentially has market power in the aftermarkets associated with its own products. An important question is to what extent, if any, should the antitrust laws restrict the firm's behavior in these aftermarkets? In this paper we explore three models that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012733441
Consider a durable goods producer that potentially has market power in the aftermarkets associated with its products. An important question is to what extent, if any, should the antitrust laws restrict the firm's behavior in these aftermarkets? In this paper we explore a number of models...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013248539
Consider a durable goods producer that has the option of monopolizing an aftermarket such as repair for its own product. An important question is whether such monopolization reduces welfare? We show that the answer to this question is frequently no. In particular, we explore three models that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013147652
In response to the "standardless" approach used in LePage's v. 3M, the Antitrust Modernization Commission (AMC) and others advocate using a discount allocation approach to assess whether bundled loyalty discounts violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act. This approach treats loyalty discounts like...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012464448
Consider a durable goods producer that potentially has market power in the aftermarkets associated with its products. An important question is to what extent, if any, should the antitrust laws restrict the firm's behavior in these aftermarkets? In this paper we explore a number of models...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012470643