Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002527821
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003733800
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003821765
This paper offers a complete overview of the oligopoly problem in competition law and economics, with a specific focus on European Union (EU) law. A related purpose of the paper is to challenge the dominant view that merger control is the ultimate preventive remedy against tacit collusion. On...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091671
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012722799
The main objective of this article is to shed light on the compatibility of price discrimination with EC competition law. We offer an analytical framework which distinguishes between different categories of price discrimination depending on their effects on competition. Our framework suggests...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012758791
In European Union ("EU") competition law, the supply policy of a dominant input provider can be deemed unlawful, if his wholesale and retail price-mix forces rival input purchasers to compete at a loss on the downstream market. This is known as an abusive "margin squeeze". Whilst this stands to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013046068
This paper explores the possibility of remedial intervention against the credit rating oligopoly under the competition rules. It is divided in six parts. Following an introduction, Part II provides an overview of the credit rating industry. Part III demonstrates that there is a possible economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014178716
This paper attempts to demonstrate that whilst parallel trade (also referred to as “grey market trade” in the United States, or as “arbitrage” in economic theory) in the European Union is subject to a remarkably favourable legal regime, the economic case supporting this approach remains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014192224
The first prong of Article 82 of the EC Treaty, which prohibits abuses of a dominant position, requires, prior to the identification of abusive behaviour, evidence that the firm under scrutiny enjoys a dominant position. Surprisingly, this issue seems to be sometimes overlooked. Enforcers,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014063324