Showing 1 - 10 of 34
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012182203
This paper shows how competing firms can facilitate tacit collusion by making passive investments in rivals. In general, the incentives of firms to collude depend in a complex way on the whole set of partial cross ownership (PCO) in the industry. We show that when firms are identical, only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263345
The assumption that decision makers choose actions to maximize their preferences is a central tenet in economics. This assumption is often justied either formally or informally by appealing to evolutionary arguments. In contrast, we show that in almost every game and for almost every family of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266276
This paper develops a general methodology for characterizing the dynamic evolution of preferences in a wide class of strategic interactions. We give simple conditions characterizing the limiting distribution of preferences in general games, and apply our results to study the evolutionary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266303
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012098808
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012103457
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012103501
There is a growing concern that minority shareholding (MS) in rival firms may facilitate collusion. To examine this concern, we exploit the fact that leniency programs (LPs) are generally recognized as a shock that destabilizes collusive agreements and study the effect that the introduction of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011730845
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011804722
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011804744