Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001406735
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001393458
This note analyses investment and risk-taking in a simple agency model of public regulation/procurement borrowed from Laffont & Tirole (1993). We show that the principal will overinvest or underinvest depending on whether investment is marginally more productive in bad or in good states. Due to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005841021
In monetary economics it is argued that due to agency cost in financial contracting a reduction of a firm's net worth will transmit into a decline of investment. This paper shows that the microeconomic foundation of this 'balance-sheet-channel' is dubious. Contrary to a common claim agency...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005841022
We develop a dynamic model of strategic investment in a transnational pipeline system. In the absence of international contract enforcement, countries may distort investment in order to increase their bargaining power, resulting in overinvestment in expensive and underinvestment in cheap...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010271079
We use cooperative game theory to analyze the strategic impact of three controversial pipeline projects. Two of them, Nord Stream and South Stream, allow Russian gas to bypass transit countries, Ukraine and Belarus. Nord Stream's strategic value turns out to be huge, justifying the high...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011374346
Existing cooperative game theoretic studies of bargaining power in gas pipeline systems are based on the so called characteristic function form (CFF). This approach is potentially misleading if some pipelines fall under regulated third party access (TPA). TPA, which is by now the norm in the EU,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012016390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011628946
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011309249
We develop a dynamic model of strategic investment in a transnational pipeline system. In the absence of international contract enforcement, countries may distort investment in order to increase their bargaining power, resulting in overinvestment in expensive and underinvestment in cheap...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003793068