Showing 1 - 10 of 24
This study examines the effects of major board reforms on firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance in countries around the world. Using a difference-in-differences design, we find robust evidence that worldwide board reforms can have significant effects on various stakeholders,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013221463
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014451374
Although foreign institutional ownership (FIO) is generally considered as an important outcome of international cross-listings, much of the prior research ignores the iterative nature of FIO – that is, FIO may also serve as a key determinant of cross-listings. Using a comprehensive dataset of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014257670
Using the setting of corporate site visits, this study examines the information interpretation role of board secretaries on market information efficiency. We find that the presence of the board secretary during corporate site visits can significantly improve the information content of such...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012612706
Information is the basis for independent directors to make correct decisions. The study found that the participation of independent directors in the shareholder meetings would help them to obtain more real information and curb the excessive risk taking phenomenon of firms caused by agency...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014551002
This study investigates the impact of independent directors' participation in the shareholders meeting on corporate governance, and finds that the more frequently the independent directors attend shareholder meetings, the lower the degree of earnings management by the enterprise; the mechanism...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014237787
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011350087
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011478046
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013165402
CEOs of public (listed) firms earn more than their counterparts in similar private (unlisted) firms. This can either be because rent extraction is easier in public firms than in private firms, or because managing a public firm involves more legal and institutional responsibilities than managing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849653