Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873905
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003810612
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003903886
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003903881
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003492320
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688947
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001485049
In this article, we show how to value projects financed by subsidized loans using the standard WACC method, with three distinct assumptions concerning the debt ratio targeted by the firm. In fact, the subsidized loan amount used to calculate this debt ratio can be determined according to book...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153283
Richard Miller's reply (2008) to my comment (2008) on his claim (2007) that the standard WACC formula fails to correctly remunerate shareholders and bondholders raises crucial questions on the nature of the project's debt that he considers in his calculations. To clarify this point, I here...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153362
In this journal, Miller (2008) argues that the standard WACC formula fails to correctly remunerate shareholders and bondholders. This is proved by considering a project yielding a zero net present value. In this comment, we prove that this apparent failure of the standard WACC approach simply...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153367