Showing 1 - 10 of 1,879
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001740151
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001471495
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003834529
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002937978
Implicit in the drug-approval process is a trade-off between Type I and Type II error. We explore the application of Bayesian decision analysis (BDA) to minimize the expected cost of drug approval, where relative costs are calibrated using U.S. Burden of Disease Study 2010 data. The results for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012457169
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012303603
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011347343
Implicit in the drug-approval process is a host of decisions---target patient population, control group, primary endpoint, sample size, follow-up period, etc.---all of which determine the trade-off between Type I and Type II error. We explore the application of Bayesian decision analysis (BDA)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014133940
With the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, the FDA included an unchallengeable exclusivity period for newly approved drugs, independent of patents. This potentially generates an incentive for firms to strategically delay the introduction of new versions (reformulations) of drugs until just before patent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014135034
Implicit in the drug-approval process is a trade-off between Type I and Type II error. We explore the application of Bayesian decision analysis (BDA) to minimize the expected cost of drug approval, where relative costs are calibrated using U.S. Burden of Disease Study 2010 data. The results for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013016659