Showing 1 - 10 of 26
This paper uses the rules of engineering as a rhetorical device to discuss why the international financial architecture needs a structured mechanism for dealing with sovereign insolvency. The paper suggests that the most important problem with the status-quo relates to delayed defaults and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009702920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003900195
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009381482
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009261761
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009786958
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009791145
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010344449
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003803741
Few would dispute that sovereign defaults entail significant economic costs, including, most notably, important output losses. However, most of the evidence supporting this conventional wisdom, based on annual observations, suffers from serious measurement and identification problems. To address...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012732706
This paper evaluates empirically four types of cost that may result from an international sovereign default: reputational costs, international trade exclusion costs, costs to the domestic economy through the financial system, and political costs to the authorities. It finds that the economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012768225