Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002583522
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001860213
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001831943
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001752590
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001752607
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001732977
Recent merger cases involving the transfer of control over “big data” concluded that these mergers would not lead to competition problems because there was a sufficient number of other data sources available to the various players in the market. These merger cases implicitly accepted, but...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909168
This paper studies tests of calendar effects in equity returns. It is necessary to control for all possible calendar effects to avoid spurious results. The authors contribute to the calendar effects literature and its significance with a test for calendar-specific anomalies that conditions on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010397591
When evaluating the significance of calendar effects, such as those associated with Monday and January, it is necessary to control for all possible calendar effects to avoid spurious results. The downside of having to control for a large number of possible calendar effects is that it diminish...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318856
This paper applies the Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure of Hansen, Lunde, and Nason (2003) to a set of volatility models. A MCS is analogous to confidence interval of a parameter in the sense that the former contains the best forecasting model with a certain probability. The key to the MCS...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318935