Showing 1 - 10 of 61
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000630094
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003854468
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003424959
Recently proposed models of risky choice imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. Five studies explored whether people show patterns of intransitivity predicted by four descriptive models. To distinguish trueʺ violations from those produced by error,ʺ a model was fit in which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003374889
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003375629
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003934148
This paper presents an experimental study analyzing common consequence effects with binary choice, willingness-to-pay (WTP), and willingness-to-accept (WTA). Consistent with previous research we do not find clearcut evidence of fanning out in the absence of certainty effects. Violation rates of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950279
In previous models of (cumulative) prospect theory reference-dependence of preferences is imposed beforehand and the location of the reference point is exogenously determined. This note provides a foundation of prospect theory, where reference-dependence is derived from preference conditions and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950287
This paper presents an experimental test of several independence conditions implied by expected utility and alternative models. We perform a repeated choice experiment and fit an error model that allows us to discriminate between true violations of independence and those that can be attributed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950296
This paper tests Birnbaum’s (2004) theory that the constant consequence paradoxes of Allais are due to violations of coalescing, the assumption that when two branches lead to the same consequence, they can be combined by adding their probabilities. Rank dependent utility and cumulative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950768