Showing 1 - 10 of 16
We formulate a simple quantum decision model of the Ellsberg paradox. We report the results of an experiment we performed to test the matching probabilities predicted by this model using an incentive compatible method. We find that the theoretical predictions of the model are in conformity with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011877824
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012159970
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008667002
In this paper we begin by stressing the empirical importance of non-linear weighting of probabilities, which expected utility theory (EU) is unable to accommodate. We then go on to outline three stylized facts on non-linear weighting that any alternative theory of risk must address. These are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003953021
Evidence shows that (i) people overweight low probabilities and underweight high probabilities, but (ii) ignore events of extremely low probability and treat extremely high probability events as certain. The main alternative decision theories, rank dependent utility (RDU) and cumulative prospect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003954029
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003546349
We formulate a general theory of preferences over outcome-time-probability triplets and decompose uncertainty into risk and hazard. We define the delay, defer, shift and certainty functions that can be uniquely elicited from behaviour. These individually determine stationarity, the common...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012599133
How do human beings make decisions when, as the evidence indicates, the assumptions of the Bayesian rationality approach in economics do not hold? Do human beings optimize, or can they? Several decades of research have shown that people possess a toolkit of heuristics to make decisions under...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011926917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012159959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011473560