Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003774441
In criminal cases the task of the judge is to transform the uncertainty about the facts into the certainty of the verdict. In this experiment we examine the relationship between evidence of which the strength is known, subjective probability of guilt and verdict for abstract cases. We look at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011377092
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009718595
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011434619
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003446442
In a recent article, Lyon and Rasmusen (2004) argue that buyer-option contracts are more effective at solving the holdup problem than has been previously recognized. This article examines the robustness of that claim to changes in the bargaining game they analyze and to changes in the nature of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012716446
In criminal cases the task of the judge is to transform the uncertainty about the facts into the certainty of the verdict. In this experiment we examine the relationship between evidence of which the strength is known, subjective probability of guilt and verdict for abstract cases. We look at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325809
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009243335
In criminal cases the task of the judge is to transform the uncertainty about the facts into the certainty of the verdict. In this experiment we examine the relationship between evidence of which the strength is known, subjective probability of guilt and verdict for abstract cases. We look at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011255690
In criminal cases the task of the judge is to transform the uncertainty about the facts into the certainty of the verdict. In this experiment we examine the relationship between evidence of which the strength is known, subjective probability of guilt and verdict for abstract cases. We look at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005209452