Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010485784
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012138394
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010517132
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012171637
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008653170
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009717270
Both the GAO (2003, 2008) and the US Treasury (2008) have implied that the Big 4 dominated US audit market lacks competition. More recently, the PCAOB has expressed a somewhat different concern, i.e., that because audit committees may be primarily interested in negotiating a lower audit fee...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012893888
We examine whether the December 2007 PCAOB disciplinary order against Deloitte affected Deloitte's switching risk, audit fees, and audit quality relative to the other Big 4 firms over a three-year period following the censure. Our findings suggest that the PCAOB censure was associated with a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013006210
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012195357
In recent years, policy makers have expressed concern about the risks posed by audit market concentration (i.e., high market shares for the dominant Big 4 audit firms) for audit quality. In this paper, we examine the relation between concentration at the local (i.e., metropolitan statistical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013092434