Showing 1 - 10 of 93
We estimate the deterrence effects of European Commission (EC) merger policy instruments over the 1990-2009 period. Our empirical results suggest that phase-1 remedies uniquely generate robust deterrence as – unlike phase-1 withdrawals, phase-2 remedies, and preventions – phase-1 remedies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011392122
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011406090
We estimate the deterrence effects of European Commission (EC) merger policy instruments over the 1990-2009 period. Our empirical results suggest that phase-1 remedies uniquely generate robust deterrence as – unlike phase-1 withdrawals, phase-2 remedies, and preventions – phase-1 remedies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013011024
We estimate the deterrence effects of European Commission (EC) merger policy instruments over the 1990-2009 period. Our empirical results suggest that phase-1 remedies uniquely generate robust deterrence as – unlike phase-1 withdrawals, phase-2 remedies, and preventions – phase-1 remedies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013011314
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011613337
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011878231
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003886130
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009749942
We show that the number of merger proposals (frequency-based deterrence) is a more appropriate indicator of underlying changes in merger policy than the relative anti-competitiveness of merger proposals (composition-based deterrence). This has strong implications for the empirical analysis of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013155108
The European Commission (EC) has long intended to play a leadership role in setting a pan-European competition policy; yet, both centralized and decentralized tendencies have been manifest in the European context for competition policy. It is not clear the whether these leadership intentions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014163646