Showing 1 - 6 of 6
We study strategic behavior by private litigants when courts' judgments are "inalienable" in the sense that it is unlawful to contract around them ex post. Inalienable judgments arise in many contexts, including antitrust, labor law, intellectual property, unfair competition, and various types...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013294314
We consider strategic behavior in non-Coasean litigation: private disputes such that the court's judgment may influence the final allocation of rights even if transaction costs are zero. This occurs when the law prohibits otherwise-profitable efforts to contract around the court's judgment. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013231047
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001179182
The welfare state could not function without judgments about how well off its citizens are. For example, governments devise progressive income taxes, which are designed to capture more wealth from the well off and less from the impecunious. These policies presume an ability to take a manageable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013159823
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012856971
Ronald Coase merged two traditions in economics, marginalism and institutionalism. Neoclassical economics in the 1930s was characterized by an abstract conception of marginalism and frictionless resource movement. Marginal analysis did not seek to uncover the source of individual human...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014198928