Showing 1 - 10 of 595
Many centralized matching schemes incorporate a mix of random lottery and non-lottery tie-breaking. A leading example is the New York City public school district, which uses criteria like test scores and interviews to generate applicant rankings for some schools, combined with lottery...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012453541
Lottery estimates suggest oversubscribed urban charter schools boost student achievement markedly. But these estimates needn't capture treatment effects for students who haven't applied to charter schools or for students attending charters for which demand is weak. This paper reports estimates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012457874
One of the most wide-ranging reforms in public education in the last decade has been the reorganization of large comprehensive high schools into small schools with roughly 100 students per grade. We use assignment lotteries embedded in New York City's high school match to estimate the effects of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012459085
A central argument for school choice is that families value the freedom to exercise choice and can make wise decisions. This principle may underlie why lottery-based school evaluations, which exploit over-subscription due to excess demand, have almost always reported positive or zero achievement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012456832
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011430684
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011538634
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011542259
Lottery estimates suggest oversubscribed urban charter schools boost student achievement markedly. But these estimates needn't capture treatment effects for students who haven't applied to charter schools or for students attending charters for which demand is weak. This paper reports estimates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010510717
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011782986
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011797017