Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Die Effizienz der Mitbestimmung auf Betriebs- und Unternehmensebene wird in diesem Beitrag aus einer mikroökonomischer Perspektive betrachtet. Unser Augenmerk liegt hierbei auf der Frage, ob aus dem nicht oder zumindest nur seltenen freiwilligen Zustandekommen von Mitbestimmungsregelungen auf...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009373283
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001495097
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001434277
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001082336
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014548832
In two-person generosity games the proposer's agreement payoff is exogenously given whereas that of the responder is endogenously determined by the proposer's choice of the pie size. Earlier results for two-person generosity games show that participants seem to care more for efficiency than for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003952438
In two-person generosity games, the proposer’s agreement payoff is exogenously given, whereas that of the responder is endogenously determined by the proposer’s choice of the pie size. In three-person generosity games, equal agreement payoffs for two of the players are either exogenously...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009751380
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010345258
In generosity games, one agreement payoff is exogenously given, whereas the other is endogenously determined by the proposer's choice of the "pie" size. This has been shown to induce pie choices which are either efficiency or equality seeking. In our experiment, before playing the generosity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008758824
In two-person generosity games the proposer's agreement payoffis exogenously given whereas that of the responder is endogenouslydetermined by the proposer's choice of the pie size. Earlier resultsfor two-person generosity games show that participants seem to caremore for eciency than for equity....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005870886