Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013326705
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011583488
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011518262
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is notoriously insensitive to distributional concerns, favoring a policy with a positive sum of monetary equivalents, even if better-off individuals are benefitted at the expense of worse-off ones. This problem is sometimes mitigated, in practice, by monetizing goods...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013050711
Well-Being and Fair Distribution provides a rigorous and comprehensive defense of the “social welfare function” as a tool for evaluating governmental policies. In particular, it argues for a “prioritarian” social welfare function: one that gives greater weight to well-being changes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014174416
Standard cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is insensitive to distributional concerns. A policy that improves the lives of the rich, and makes the poor yet worse off, will be approved by CBA as long as the policy’s aggregate monetized benefits are positive. Distributional weights offer an apparent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014154551
Can we measure inequity? Can we arrive at a number or numbers capturing the extent to which a given society is equitable or inequitable? Sometimes such questions are answered with a “no”: equity is a qualitative, non-numerical consideration. This Article offers a different perspective. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014158122
Conventionally, benefit-cost analysis focuses on economic efficiency, summing the values of a policy’s costs and benefits based on the preferences of those affected. There is widespread agreement that it should be supplemented with information on how the impacts are distributed across...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013306340
This paper, a comment on an essay by Satz and White that appeared in the IFS Deaton Review (Sept. 2021), argues that redistribution of wealth for the purpose of advancing equality (rather than improving the worst off) can be provided an institutional defense against the "leveling down" charge...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013321452
In its current form, antitrust law is often said to advance consumer welfare and to disregard economic inequality. But with the right priority-setting and other modest reforms, efforts to increase consumer welfare might simultaneously reduce economic inequality. Because monopoly and monopsony...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013306432